Boggs Center – Living For Change Newsletter – October 13th, 2020

October 13th, 2020

revolution image final


water


Thinking for Ourselves

No Equivalent
Shea Howell

Last week 13 people were arrested in a plot to kidnap and kill Governor Gretchen Whitmer. They also planned to blow up bridges and kill specific law enforcement people. They intended to storm the State Capital and to incite a civil war.

Governor Whitmer, who has known for some time of this particular plot, responded with clarity and courage, saying of the conspirators, “They’re not militias. They are domestic terrorists endangering and intimidating their fellow Americans. Words matter.” In a strongly worded editorial in the Washington Post Governor Whitmer explained:

When our leaders encourage domestic terrorists, they legitimize their actions. When they stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit. And when a sitting president stands on a national stage refusing to condemn white supremacists and hate groups, as President Trump did when he told the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by” during the first presidential debate, he is complicit. Hate groups heard the president’s words not as a rebuke, but as a rallying cry. As a call to action.”

The Governor’s clarity is critical for us to understand the dangerous, polarized moment we are all now facing.

Many in the media obscure this danger by refusing to name right- wing forces for what they are, criminal gangs, bent on killing. Paul Egan, for example, writing in the Free Press created a false distinction between groups that provide armed “security” at public events and what the Governor and most experts on right wing terrorists call “hate groups.”

Eagan argues that “the truth is somewhere in between” and private military groups “should not be all lumped together and must be judged and labeled based on their actions and intentions.”

The truth is that the actions and intentions of right-wing forces are now, and have historically been, the use of violence to protect property and white supremacy. The definition of right-wing movement is the effort to push society toward establishing order, which requires the use of violence.

This is in sharp contrast to left wing movements, which center people above property. Now and historically, left wing movements have aimed for justice and been rooted in calls for peace.

While both the right and the left have occasionally taken up arms, the essence of the right wing is violence. That is why they typically embrace such issues as: military intervention into other countries, the use of nuclear weapons, the expansion of police powers, and limitations on government efforts to control corporate power. They oppose any effort to advance human rights, save that of the fetus. Even in the name of “pro-life,” they have justified the killing of doctors who perform abortions and the deaths of women who risk their own lives by giving birth. They insist women violated by rape be required to give birth. In recent history in Michigan, they have blown up school busses to protect white supremacy. These are the actions and intentions of right-wing forces.

Just this summer we have seen a proliferation of armed, right wing groups confronting people gathering in defense of Black lives. Recent research documents almost 600 such instances noting, “The number of serious incidents of outright violence, shootings, vehicular assaults or menacing with a pointed gun is on the up.”

Even more concerning is that “at least 40% of the almost 600 recorded total, were uncoordinated, with no known involvement of the Oath Keepers, Three Percenters, Proud Boys, or any other established group.” This means there have been at least 240 instances where armed white men have been enacting gun fantasies on our streets, claiming to protect property and willing to kill people.

This activity is clearly illegal. It is also immoral. There is no equivalent between the violence of the right and the aspirations of the left. Those like Egan, who claim the truth is somewhere in between, are enabling the most viscous aspect of our country to feel justified in what they do.

Instead of writing sympathetically about the anxiety of white men in turbulent times, we need to be clear about the consequences of their actions. Only by facing this reality, will people be able to determine what choices move us closer to creating peaceful, loving communities.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Chief Craig Must Go flyer PDF 1


Nearly 41 years after Ku Klux Klansmen and American Nazis shot dead five antiracist activists in the town of Greensboro, North Carolina, the City Council there has passed a resolution apologizing for the attack and the police department’s complicity in the killings. We speak with two survivors of the 1979 attack, Reverend Nelson Johnson and Joyce Hobson Johnson, who say the city’s apology acknowledges “the police knew and chose to do nothing. In fact, they facilitated what we name now as a North American death squad.”
KEEP READING

 


Try Email Marketing with VerticalResponse!

 

Education, Three Generations, In this Moment – By Rich Feldman

Education, Three Generations, In this Moment

By Rich Feldman

What follows is an exchange of ideas between three generations of my family, at the intersection of public education, labor unions, and interpretations of social justice in a time of unprecedented strife.

Coequal with the strife is the corruption and runaway wealth of fewer than one percent of our population, racist capitalism with deep roots in the endemic and flawed ideology of white supremacy. Amid daily protests that are largely youth driven, the Black Lives Matter movement demands big, bold institutional change.  In more subtle and insidious ways, institutions that have not served people of color equitably are being internally corrupted and reinvented by those who seek to preserve our white supremacist ways. We cannot run or hide any more. Institutional change is coming, and we must leverage the will and wrest back the power to ensure that change is just, decent, humanizing and inclusive in all of our social institutions, including and especially our system of education.

Beginning with my daughter Emma, a teacher for seven years in a Boston elementary school, who shared these heartfelt thoughts on Facebook, titling them “Re-Imagining Safety”:

Can we please expand our notions of safety as we talk about “going back?”

I don’t want to go back to our schools. They have failed — kids, educators, families, communities for generations (yes, even pre-covid). SCHOOLS WERE NOT SAFE BEFORE THE PANDEMIC.  Do you remember Columbine, Metal Detectors, Police in schools, water safety?

Please stop perpetuating this false dichotomy. When we don’t broaden our notions of safety — we are letting Trump and DeVos set the agenda about what reopening looks like.

What would you (you: educators, families, kids, community members) add as we say: What are the 6 ADDITIONAL things we MUST ensure to go back to school safely?

Some ideas I have heard include (but aren’t limited to):

  1. Police out of our school
  2. place-based curriculum that honors and learns from the brilliance of the communities where our students live,
  3. Outdoor classrooms that demonstrate we must learn not just from the 4-walls of our “classrooms”
  4. Anti-racist, Anti-Sexist, Anti-Ableist curriculum and pedagogy (yes, no more color sticks for behavior management),
  5. Moratorium on firing any teachers of color from a system that currently has no clue on educating black children, or children of color.
  6. Inclusive classrooms so ALL children learn with the kids from their communities (not just those disabled kids labeled “inclusion ready”),
  7. Joyful classrooms where teachers have time to grow as educators and have time to breathe throughout the school day,
  8. Recess spaces that allow kids to play, solve conflicts, and grow, lunch spaces with food that is found, cooked, and prepared with the community at the center…
  9. Oh yeah, and lots of love, imagination, and healing.

Emma is also active in the Boston Teachers Union.   She is the grand-daughter of my mother, Pearl Feldman, who went on strike in 1968 with the United Federation of Teachers for all the wrong reasons.  My mother rejected the commitment and aspirations of black parents putting forward the demand for community control of schools in the Ocean Hill –  Brownsville neighborhood of NYC.    My mother was protecting her seniority, her livelihood, our family opportunities and her dreams at the expense of “the other.”  Her choices supported my opportunity to go to college but what about the rest of the students and children?

As teacher unions,  educators, parents and students continue to debate the challenges of “returning to school,” I cannot get my mother and Emma’s grandmother out of mind.  Nor can I get the vision, the understanding, or the commitment of my daughter, to her students first, and to her precious work with them.  With thanks to Emma’s mother (her other biggest fan and a teacher) my wife, friend, comrade  of 40 years, these deep-seated beliefs that Emma holds dear grow from her heart, and are the foundation of  a deeper understanding and unveiled acknowledgement of the failures of education in our country.    Emma  was raised in a family of committed activists and surrounded by elders like Vincent Harding, James and Grace Lee Boggs and so many others.   Janice is one of the greatest listeners on this planet and  Janice always listened to Emma’s frustrations, dreams and fears.  This is important for all children but especially important for Emma  because  she  is also a younger sister of Micah who was born with an intellectual disability.  Micah has been a self-advocate and pioneer in the inclusive education movement.  Check out the film “Intelligent lives” and Janice’s book What Matters: Reflections on Disability, Community and Love.  Emma and Micah lived, learned with dreams, agony and ecstasy about the importance of inclusive education and that “a community that excludes even one of its members is no community at all,” (Dan Wilkins).

Education and Unions: at a Crossroad

     The growth of teachers’ unions gave me opportunities and also denied others their opportunity.  Today can be different.  We do not want to repeat our history, we want to change our story.

In 1967, I was able to go to “out of town” college because my mother was in the United Federation of Teachers in NYC.  I moved from Brooklyn, NY to Ann Arbor, Michigan in August of 1967.  Ann Arbor is 40 miles from Detroit.  August 1967 was one month after the Detroit & Newark Rebellions.

The opportunity to go to University of Michigan changed my life and my aspirations.  I joined the anti-war movement, became active with Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), attended the demonstrations at the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, traveled to the 1969 United Front Against Fascism organized by the Black Panther Party and even drove to Woodstock. These choices informed and shaped my life. They continue to inform my thinking, values and vision for activism, unions, and community transformation.

I have been privileged by my opportunities and by my more than 50 years of radical, revolutionary relationships, connections, study, challenges and dreams.

After leaving Ann Arbor, I worked the assembly line for 20 years at the Ford Truck Plant, was an elected union official for about a decade and worked for the international staff of the UAW before retiring in 2015.

I also worked with James and Grace Lee Boggs for more than 40 years.  During the Community Control Movement and in response to Brown versus Board of Education, Grace Lee Boggs challenged activists to re-define the purpose of education.  She wrote Education to Govern and later she and Jimmy Boggs wrote and spoke extensively about the need for a paradigm shift in education.

With all my good intentions, my attempts at transforming my union, challenging and struggling with the union to listen and learn from the communities and the evolving community issues in our country, primarily the need  to confront racism among white workers,  I know that more than 50% of white workers in the UAW voted for Donald Trump.   The union essentially became a temporary insurance agent for an  economic and seniority crisis.  When our union “did the right thing” it had little to do with the membership and mostly to do with the “left leaning intellectual tradition of some staff and elected leadership.

While I have no regrets from my journey, I believe that the relevancy of unions in 2020 will only matter when they/we take on the needs and concerns of parents, community members, students and not just the unionized workforce.

The Freedom Movement, the Non-Violent Struggle, Black Power Movement of the 1960s and the Movement for Black Lives has captured the imagination and dreams of a generation assuming leadership in our organizing, our communities and in our unions.  Today’s bold leadership has been informed and grown from the struggles of those in all the humanizing movements of the 20th century.  From LGBTQ to the Disability Justice Movement, the anti-apartheid movement to the rights of the Palestinian people.  From Standing Rock to the Global Climate Struggles of this century we now find ourselves confronted with a world-wide pandemic, which, in a dearth of national leadership, has cost us almost 200,000 human lives. Somehow, amid almost nightly protests, since the horrifying murder of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, there has not been attributable spread of the virus due to these large gatherings. Facial masks that have been mandated in some states and locales, have also become signage; many masks are printed with Black Lives Matter, #BLM, “I can’t breathe” and more are prominent still in marches and protests. These masks, that cover our mouths and noses, do prevent some spread of the coronavirus. Even so, COVID-19 has limited some immuno-compromised and older citizens from engaging in these examples of Democracy. Protestors do incur some additional risk during the pandemic.

 

Questions of Purpose, Courage, and Safety

To return to Emma’s original question – what does it mean to be safe now, in 2020?  Schools have been closed since March, reopening is a scatter-shot attempt to try to get students back safely, which means a checkerboard of “solutions” that feel wholly unsatisfying, not scientifically informed and locally decided by school boards who are likely not public health experts. Moreover there are increased costs of cleaning and sanitizing classrooms, and more purchasing of technology for students in schools that are using hybrid models for safe return. As of this moment, there is no national plan for how our public schools should re-open. States and cities are working hard to get students back to school in the absence of good guidance. The national  teachers’ unions, the National Education Association (NEA) and The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) have varying degrees of information about COVID-19 on their websites. Following suit, the local unions are involved in these “community” based decisions to varying degrees, probably based on the strength of their local leadership. Teachers are stressed and afraid; the pandemic and its relentless spread not only affects teachers and students, but extended families, too.

Returning to the mistakes made in 1968, by my mother and her national union president, Albert Shanker, of the AFT, where in New York City (NYC) they prioritized the demands of their membership over the concerns, needs and voices of the community. To be sure, we are in a unique time and space, but equally true is the fact that the system of education is broken and growing numbers of parents, teachers, students and educators know it. Emma’s questions and suggestions listed earlier are the result of knowing this, and asking bigger deeper questions, and taking some risk. Teachers have the opportunity to stand for something beyond “protecting”;  to move from protecting themselves, sometimes with good intentions,  to leading and becoming active players in creating the future.

It is not only Trump and Devos who are breaking the system.  It has been totally bankrupt since No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, from Bush to Obama. It has been broken for decades and decades.  Lip service reforms (i.e. we support social & environmental justice concerns) or solutions dedicated to failed concepts of success have not worked and will not work.  If our children continue to experience  failed Individualized Education Programs ( IEPs),  attend underfunded schools with insufficient resources,  face trauma daily because too often teachers, administrators and school systems have been concerned with their/our “professional-union lane” rather than building a new highway.  There are, however, signs of hope. We can learn from the Chicago Teachers’ Union (CTU) which made a commitment to create critical connections and relationships with community, students, educators AND parents to remind us that education must include art, music, counselors, nurses, health, safety, play time, outside time and          concern for the dignity of each student.

Here is a credo for education and a challenge to our “usual union thinking.”  It is time to strike for the common good and public good.  I remember that teachers in Oaxaca, Mexico raised up the demand and initiated a strike stating that, “there will not be a new contract until every student had new shoes on the first day of school. “  In 2006, In These Times reported:

Since May 22, tens of thousands of teachers and administrative workers belonging to

Oaxaca’s Section 22 of the National Union of Education Workers have been on strike,

camping out in the colonial town square, shutting off highways, blocking government

buildings and marking their territory–all of downtown Oaxaca–with political graffiti,

reading, “The movement has no leaders; it is from the grassroots!” The teachers’

demands include school uniforms and shoes for all students, more scholarships, and an

increased budget for school buildings and equipment.

Beyond safety and protectionism: What kind of courage and vision is required of each of us and our institutions?

 These ideas and proposals have come from educators, teachers, principals  and friends.

Point One:

We face this moment of a continued out of control Pandemic because our national leadership fundamentally ignored reality, science and the lives of its citizens.  This failed policy was intentional.

It has exposed the bankruptcy of this leadership and has uncovered the 400 year veil of racial capitalism, the decades and centuries of systemic racist policies, values and culture. When we look at the data of the percentage of black people and people of color who have died, there is not much argument to be made for a return to normal.  We also have learned that nursing homes, group homes, homeless shelters, prisons and detention centers  are not safe places; they are particularly vulnerable to the ravages of the virus.

Point Two:

There is no going back to “Normal” because Normal is the seeds and roots of the system that has failed and been totally broken down for decades and even centuries.  The public school system and schools have failed and the time for reform is over.  We now hear the words of Abolitionist Education.  No reforming slavery, no reforming the school system, no return to normal.

We need to allow teachers to prioritize relationships with their students and families, thus minimizing the trauma of this difficult time.  Our priority is to provide the love and support for authentic relationship building between teachers, staff, parents, and students.

  • Creating curriculum and education to engage in “caring for each other and the earth as the focus of all school curriculum and activities.
  • End the anxiety and trauma epidemic
  • Significantly slow down the pace of schooling so that school communities, youth and adults and families. neighbors can heal & reflect together.
  • Engage with the education community to discuss, deliberate and make decisions collectively into learning instead of focusing on content memorization/coverage which students forget after the course anyway. There is no data that show that standards and accountability strategies for “school improvement “ worked.  It is time to come to terms with the fact that the system has been an utter failure and that its only function is to support the few who keep the many down.

 

Point 3:

As the AFT continues to announce its support for strikes to “protect” its membership, what  will local leaders and teachers say or do?

  • Can the AFT unleash a discussion for the public good, the common good and initiate policies that represent the change in schooling that is so necessary. Make these strikes a “common good” strike which would mean striking to protect the health of every child, families, teachers, staff, bus drivers, and the broader community?
  • Can it strike and still engage in creative educational opportunities?

 

Point 4:

What do we dream is possible?  How do we create new practices and unleash the creativity and imagination to support families, students and teachers in the birth of the new.  What can education look like now?  What is the difference between education and schooling?

Programs for practice:  Unleash thinking and possibilities?

  • Set up neighborhood community freedom schools. Create small pods in neighborhoods with teachers, support staff and parents.  (Study history of Freedom Schools in the south and emerging freedom schools of today. Share examples of current freedom school initiatives across our country. Share resources and tools. Detroit Independent Freedom schools, Chicago Freedom Schools, Marian Wright Edelman Freedom Schools, among others.
  • Listen to parents and students: Learn from Chicago Teachers union evolution and others.
  • Engage in truth telling about 1968 teachers’ strike in NY against community control in Ocean Hills Brownsville. This was put forward in the Boston Teachers Union as they voted to get police out of schools.  It united a challenge to the system outside and a challenge to the system inside our unions and all our organizations.   Union power and racism  or community power.
  • Create respite time for parents of children with disabilities. They have been in their home with little supports for the past 5 months.
  • What is the purpose of education? Success or sicksess? At a time when technology is creating a permanent underclass and outside class, we need to move beyond  Jobs or Prison?  What has been the lie of schooling?   How does each student find their passion and create work that matters to their dignity, the community and the planet?
  • Create outdoor classrooms and schools in every stadium not being used today in every city?
  • Free computers for every student and free computer access for the entire country.
  • Where will the money come from? Defund the pentagon and the police and pay for everything
  • End all high stakes tests permanently and switch to tests using a purposeful sampling method as Deb Meier suggests.
  • End all teacher evaluation where student testing data is used. Not statistically sound and only functions to burn out teachers and administrators.
  • Provide teacher leaders and coaches with the time they need to do real instructional support instead.
  • Increase teacher pay so that teachers do not have to work two jobs and can afford college. Increase parents’ income so they can send their kids to college as well.
  • Increase teacher planning time, decrease teaching load.
  • Increase art, music because this is where healing takes place,

Re-imagining safety and protection begins with the thinking and historical understanding emerging with Abolitionist thinking and the need to re-define the purpose of education in the 21st Century based upon the words:  “A community that excludes even one of its members is no community at all” (Dan Wilkins).

Concluding Thoughts

Education and teacher unions are at a crossroads.  A crossroads because of the breakdown in the system;  the COVID-19 pandemic; the  opportunities, challenges, and creativity raised by the Movement for Black Lives, as well as growing examples of ingenious educational practice by creative teachers, parents, staff and students.

There is a growing belief that our needs and our relationships matter more than our things and our stuff.  If we listen closely, we hear the rising voice that our values are more important than our valuables and our needs are different from our wants. We often hear the words that we “are in this together” –  well then, we need to create a vision that is for all of us, not just some of us.  There is no protection of self – without protection of all.

Our choices today matter.   Returning to “normal”, returning to old solutions and paradigms that have failed, or cheerleading within the institutions that continue to self-examine and reproduce our own histories will destine us to continued failure. Decisions made today will be the marker from which we move forward or continue to move backward. If we believe that education should provide the opportunity for every human being to reach his, her, their potential, then let strikes be for the Common Good.

 

 

Boggs Center – Living For Change News Letter – October 8th, 2020

October 8th, 2020

revolution image final


Teach In Flyer new copy

 

_______________________________________________________

Thinkin for Yourselves

Daily Destruction
Shea Howell

This week the Detroit City Council voted to approve a two year $220,000 contract with DataWorks Plus to continue the use of facial recognition software in the city. This vote came after a contentious public hearing where the vast majority of speakers objected to the use of facial recognition technologies and to the extension of the contract. Councilmembers Mary Sheffield and Raquel Castaneda-Lopez , who have been reliable critics of police practices, voted against the expenditure.

Let’s be clear. Not a single council person who voted for this measure thinks it works. Everyone acknowledges that this software is racially biased. The National Institute of Standards and Technology did a study that found Black faces were 100-times more likely to be mis-identified than white ones.

Moreover, the Detroit Police Department did not even pretend that this is an essential part of their work.  They indicated that so far this year they have used the system 106 times and made 12 arrests.  That is about $18,300 per arrest attributed to this contract alone. The police have given us no indication to think that facial recognition was critical in any of these arrests. Nor do we know the outcomes of them. What we know is this is an expensive, inaccurate, flawed and dangerous tool.

We also  know that the use of facial recognition by the Detroit Police Department underscores why we need to defund police and why we need to vote out the majority of this city council.

In the course of the hearing, the Detroit Police offered assurances that they have established policies to prevent the egregious mis-identification of people like Robert Williams, who became the first person publicly known to be wrongfully arrested based on this technology.

But the case of Mr. Williams reveals far more than flawed technologies. It reveals the arrogant bullying and disrespect for people that is part and parcel of the Detroit Police Department.

In undisputed accounts of Mr. Williams arrest based on a facial “match,” Detroit police showed up at his home in Farmington Hills.  In clear violation of his most basic rights, the officers refused to tell Mr. Williams why he was being arrested. They handcuffed him in front of his wife and two young daughters, shoved him into a police car, and took him to a detention center where they still did not tell him why he was in their custody. When his wife asked where the police were taking her husband she was crassly told to “Google it.”

Such illegal and crude behaviors was overshadowed by the emphasis on the technologies  that engendered the situation. But they are familiar behaviors to most people in Detroit. In the last 4 years there have been 20,000 complaints lodged against police officers. Most often these are complaints related to the use of force, the demeanor of the officers, and the violations of basic procedures.

This is the routine experience of most people in Detroit. We are not safer because of police. In far too many daily, ordinary interactions, our souls are wounded by the disrespect and disregard for people that is normal police behavior.  This disrespect is often overlooked because of the possibility that any challenge to police power can result in death.

Yet, if we are to create true community safety, we need to look honestly at not only the most egregious violations of power, but at the daily use of destructive force. Policing must end.

_____________________________________________________________________

picture (1)

We are urging members of the Senate Judiciary and Public Safety committee to support Senate Bills 830, 831, and 1152 which would create Pregnancy Standards of care in prisons, a Community Advisory Oversight Committee for Michigan’s only women’s prison, and Pregnancy Standards of Care in jails. LEARN MORE.


n


risin

 


Try Email Marketing with VerticalResponse!

Grace Lee Boggs. (1915-2015)

Detroit activist Grace Lee Boggs died today (Oct. 5, 2015) at home in Detroit. She was 100. Boggs, the child of Chinese immigrnats, came to Detroit in the early 1950s. There she met and married James (Jimmy) Boggs, an African-American activist, author and UAW worker at Chrysler Corp. from 1940 to 1968. He died in 1993. This video is a trailer for the PBS documentary American Revolutionary: The Evolution of Grace Lee Boggs. You can watch the full documentary, first aired in 2014, here: http://www.pbs.org/pov/americanrevolu…

www.boggscenter.org

Boggs Center – Living For Change News Letter – September 28th, 2020

September 28th, 2020

Elandria C. Williams, our beloved friend, comrade, collaborator, co-visionary, mentor to many, and the Executive Director of PeoplesHub, has become an ancestor. We are holding E’s family and vast community in love and in hope.

Elandria passed in Knoxville, Tennessee on September 23, 2020, 41 years old.
elandria 2
A proud child of Civil Rights leaders, Elnora and Erven Williams, a twin and an auntie, Elandria learned early on that as a Black, queer, disabled and chronically ill person, you have to carve spaces for yourself because the system will not. In carving out space, E brought others along with them, and made space for so many more to join in. Their life was a testament to the collective, to claiming space and creating space for Black, Southern, disabled, queer, elders, youth and more.

E understood themself as a part of a lineage, as part of a tradition of freedom fighters. They carried with them the histories and memories of what it took to arrive at the present. In their words, “I sit everyday in legacy… I feel it’s really important to sit in the legacy of the people who’ve done the work before us.” As a Unitarian Universalist faith leader, a yoga practitioner, and a youth leader, Elandria’s been part of creating, fortifying, and supporting hundreds of projects over their lifetime, with a focus on the global solidarity economy, youth empowerment, transformative leadership and spiritual fortification.

Elandria’s entire life was about lifting up and mirroring back to people our divinity. 

Elandria is a part of all of us.

elandria3

Join us in expressing your love and honoring of Elandria’s legacy by posting on social media using the hashtag #ElandriaTaughtUs. 

If you would like to make a donation in honor of Elandria, please make it out to PeoplesHub and mark it for: Chronically Ill and Disabled Leadership Project, Solidarity Economy, or just generally to PeoplesHub.

If you would like to make a donation in honor of their work and life you can do that here.

Please find Elandria for social media in this folder. You may also email us with memes to contribute.
It will take a collective effort to archive, fortify and disseminate Elandria’s work for many years to come–they had so many of the visions and dreams we yearn for in their unpublished writings, conversations and thinking.

_____________________________________________________________________

Thinking for Ourselves
Trump Endorses Craig
Shea Howell

This week Chief James Craig was openly endorsed by President Trump. After watching the Chief on Fox News, Trump called the Detroit Chief “terrific.” The Chief parrots Trump’s assertions that the national demonstrations against police brutality and the killing of black people by police are organized by “outsiders,” “professionals,” “anarchists,” “leftists” and people advocating a “Marxist ideology.”

Trump said, “You have a great police chief. I watch him. I really like him a lot. Say hello to him. I think he’s terrific. I think he’s just an incredible representative; he speaks so well about a very important subject, which is crime and rioting, and all the things you
see in certain cities.”

Meanwhile Craig has continued his appearances of Fox and Friends. If the implications were not so serious, his recent  commentary on the use of a cheap U-Haul truck by protesters in Louisville to cart around home made signs and drums would be laughable. He explained with a straight face that such efforts were signs that protestors are “financed by Marxist outsiders” trying to “undermine our government.”

People across the city are taking notice of Chief Craig’s cozying up to Trump. They are also taking notice of his attacks on people who are publicly protesting his actions. They are taking note of his efforts to invoke fears of communists and left wing influence on demonstrations.

This tactic of invoking charges of “communist” against those who criticize the US government and its policies is an old trick. It is a trick Detroiters have proudly exposed and rejected.

In 1952, as US Senator Joseph McCarthy held hearings to intimidate critics of U.S. domestic and international policies, Detroit played a critical role in unmasking the foolishness behind the viciousness of the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC).

It was by standing up to this committee that Coleman A. Young became a Detroit hero. His testimony was broadcast over WJR and records of it were sold around the city. It is still worth listening to. It is a model of courageous truth telling in the face of powerful, destructive forces.

Instead of being intimidated by the Congressional hearing, Young turned the tables on his questioners, aggressively attacking them.  He challenged Southern committee members on their pronunciation of the word “Negro,” and actually forced them to apologize to him.

When one committee member accused Young of being unwilling to fight communism, Young replied:

“I am not here to fight in any un-American activities, because I consider the denial of the right to vote to large numbers of people all over the South un-American.” To the HUAC congressman from Georgia, he said: “I happen to know, in Georgia, Negro people are prevented from voting by virtue of terror, intimidation and lynchings. It is my contention you would not be in Congress today if it were not for the legal restrictions on voting on the part of my people.”

To another HUAC congressman he said:

“Congressman, neither me or none of my friends were at this plant the other day brandishing a rope in the face of John Cherveny, a young union organizer and factory worker who was threatened with repeated violence after members of the HUAC alleged that he might be a communist. I can assure you I have had no part in the hanging or bombing of Negroes in the South. I have not been responsible for firing a person from his job for what I think are his beliefs, or what somebody thinks he believes in, and things of that sort. That is the hysteria that has been swept up by this committee.”

Coleman Young understood the historic role Communists, Socialists, Marxists, Anarchists, Black Nationalists, revolutionists,  and all progressives have played in the long struggle for human rights and for the liberation of Black people.

Chief Craig may call himself a Detroiter.
But Craig is no Coleman Alexander Young.

For an extended discussion of the hearings and the atmosphere that led up to them, we recommend: “I’m Fighting for Freedom”: Coleman Young, HUAC, and the Detroit African American Community. 

Detroit City Council will vote this Tuesday, September 29th at 10am on whether to approve DPD’s request for an additional $219,984.50 to extend their current facial recognition software licenses with DataWorks Plus.

If you are still torn on where to stand on this incredibly important issue, please take a look at this short investigative report and call in and tell them not to give DPD one more dime for this discriminatory technology!!

To attend by telephone call one of the these numbers:

1 929 436 2866
1 312 626 6799
1 669 900 6833
1 253 215 8782
1 301 715 8592
1 346 248 7799

Enter Meeting ID: 330332554##

To attend online:  https://cityofdetroit.zoom.us/j/330332554

#BanFacialRecognition

#SurveillanceAintSafety

liberty

Inclusion is a process, approach, and attitude not a place or a program.  This scale is to help evaluate your communities’ initiative. The goal is by working together we will all be striving to attain a level 5 (Full Inclusion/Transformation). Inclusion is not looking at how one person can fit into a situation; inclusion looks at how to transform a system so it can better respond to diverse communities.

KEEP READING

breonna

NLG Responds to Grand Jury Proceedings in the Murder of Breonna Taylor

The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) condemns the outcome of Kentucky’s grand jury proceedings and renews its calls for justice for Breonna Taylor. On March 13, 2020, Breonna Taylor was murdered in her home by police officers executing a no-knock search warrant. The officers were acting outside of the scope of the warrant, which required them to knock and announce their presence at Taylor’s apartment, and with a wanton disrespect for human life which ultimately led to her death. Protests erupted in Kentucky—and around the world—over the summer in response to Taylor’s death, as well as in reaction to the killing of George Floyd, and state and local law enforcement have reacted with extreme force and brutality, arresting over 500 activists in Kentucky since June. On September 23, 2020, a grand jury investigation of the police killing led to the indictment of only one officer involved in the no-knock raid on three counts of wanton endangerment—in other words, not for Breonna Taylor’s death. There were no charges issued for the other two officers.

The results of the grand jury proceedings over the killing of Breonna Taylor highlight the historically unjust and uneven criminal legal system that protects the interests of white supremacy, continuing the oppression of Black and Brown lives. The NLG renews calls for an end to the racist criminal legal system, abolition of incarceration, and accountability and reparations for the countless victims of police violence. As the grand jury proceedings in the murder of Breonna Taylor show, the criminal legal system will not resolve the injustices done to Black people by its own volition. Justice will remain elusive until the police are defunded, prisons closed, and resources are reallocated to Black and Brown communities in the form of the social services, education, and economic support needed to reverse centuries of racist exploitation and oppression. It is imperative that we dismantle white supremacy and settler-colonialism in all its manifestations.

We redouble our commitment to support those demanding radical social change and we also encourage people to mourn, take care of themselves, and build with each other as we engage in this fight.

The NLG is a proud endorser of the #8toAbolition platform, which emphasizes that abolition is not only about dismantling law enforcement, but creating life-affirming systems under which everyone can thrive, rendering these old institutions obsolete. As leading scholar, activist, and abolitionist Angela Davis, who will be speaking as part of the NLG’s #Law4ThePeople Convention states, “Abolition is not primarily a negative strategy. It’s not primarily about dismantling, but it’s about re-envisioning. It’s about building anew.” The NLG unequivocally reaffirms its continued support of Black communities and all those organizing in support of abolitionist movements for liberation.

The National Lawyers Guild, whose membership includes lawyers, legal workers, jailhouse lawyers, and law students, was formed in 1937 as the United States’ first racially-integrated bar association to advocate for the protection of constitutional, human and civil rights.


 

Try Email Marketing with VerticalResponse!